Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.5a is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2010 edited
     
  1.  
    What a load of shit
    •  
      CommentAuthorcurly
    • CommentTimeOct 25th 2010 edited
     
    Its like Vanilla ice/hammer, went on a Volvo/St Martins crash course.
  2.  
    Distinct lack of peripheral vision too
    •  
      CommentAuthorToby Wrong
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    I can never see the safety lobby's obsession with helmets.
    In a country where there's no compulsory motorcycle helmet law, I'd say that fatalities would be reduced by half if wearling a lid became statutory. Coming off a motorbike, you're likely to be going a fair lick. You're likely to be thrown a respectable distance or slide/bounce and hit your bonce on something.
    Cyclists? Under what circumstances is a helmet going to make any difference? If you're going round HPC onto Grosvenor Place on the inner and someoene puts you head first into one of those thoughtfully placed bollards outside Lizzie Batts's back garden, yeah. If you're thrown over the bars and land on your head, yeah. What percentage of fatal "accidents" (I hate that word; most cycling fatalities are not accidents) fall into those categories? Two percent? Less? A helmet won't help if your noggin goes under the wheel of a ten ton Luton. How often did we see pile-ups in road races with riders doing 65kph in the pre-helmet days? And how often did any of them suffer serious head injuries?
    None of the cyclists killed in London in the past couple of years would have been helped by a helmet. (A brain would have saved most of them, but this is 2010 and they were mostly English so, they obviously didn't have one between the lot of 'em.)
    Obviously any collisions in which a helmet saved a cyclist don't make the news, but I'd still say that number of collisions would be very small indeed.
    Cyclists need to veer sharply away from the topic of helmet paranoia, or they will be made compulsory as soon as Noo Layba gets back in.
    •  
      CommentAuthoroverdrive
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    Veer sharply away from this^ post,it can cause paranoia!


    *checks helmet*
  3.  
    Helmet debate on MT forum. Oh dear.
  4.  
    FWIW, a recent report broadcast on the 'More or Less' show concluded that there simply wasn't enough data to draw any conclusions one way or another about the efficacy, or otherwise, of helmets. The presenter, Tim Harford, cycles and uses a helmet when he does so.
    • CommentAuthorsleepy
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    interesting innovation, looks like it would actually be more effective than existing helmets especially in terms of rotating impacts.
    •  
      CommentAuthorpornomike
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    Bellend.
    • CommentAuthorsleepy
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    :cry:

    i don't like it when you call me nasty names.
    •  
      CommentAuthorpornomike
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    Never you Sleeps:wink:
    •  
      CommentAuthorToby Wrong
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    Oh, God!
    It's Swedish!
    How culturally diverse!
    They'd ban cycling... and motorcycling... and cars... except Volvos... if they had the chance.
    •  
      CommentAuthorpornomike
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    Brilliant comment. Not much else to say.
    •  
      CommentAuthorpornomike
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2010
     
    Except, BELLEND.
    •  
      CommentAuthorglib
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2010
     
    Does anyone wear protection on their own helmets when doing a delivery around the back?
    • CommentAuthorRapattack
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2010
     
    Can we change the title of this thread to bellends? its so much more entertaining than plain ole bike helmets
    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2010
     
    :smile:
  5.  
    I thought this thread was going to be about bar-end mounted bells.
  6.  
    Nah, its Swedish bell end mounted bars.