Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.5a is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

    •  
      CommentAuthorJanky
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     
    Given the expense, heft, and poor function of the radio I use at work. I find myself wondering about replacing it with a phone with push to talk services. My XDA is also shockingly crap. Why not scrap one or both.

    -I head that orange offer (or maybe offered.. they no longer push it but maybe buisness clients can still enroll?) a service called "Talk Now" that none of their sales staff have ever heard of, has anyone used this?

    -YouPoC sounds like an up and running provider in the UK. Rugged looking handsets, close in price to a radio.

    -New nokia handsets will be push to talk compatible according to the Nokia website.. I dunno what protocol/service they will use.

    -last option would be to scrap our crap windows mobile XDAs (crash 5-10 times a day, very slow, fragile) and get some sort of futuristic phones that can to push to talk, and run basic despatch software.
    http://downloads.cnet.co.uk/0,39100207,39476638s,00.htm
    http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=320246525&mt=8
    http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=320149171&mt=8

    I don't know if any of these are good enough or if anyone has written decent despatch software for the mac/iphone yet, but nothing could be much worse than what I am currently using (ROCS on a windows mobile XDA. The idea of NOT renting an XDA and radio from the company also has a lot of appeal. Couriers could buy smartphones, install the software, and maintain, charge, and replace the devices as necessary I suspect this would come to less than the £20 a week that some couriers pay. Companies waste many man-hours trying to get the XDAs to work with buggy software and an unstable operating system. City sprint supposedly has their own in-house tech guy to configure and fix the XDAs (I find it interesting that they use old units, the same software for ages, and still seem to have far better performance (jobs come through quickly) and battery life (seem to last the working day) than many other outfits.)

    I think that the major problem we have is that despatch software is a fairly small niche market.. ROCs can't be arsed to fix the many problems that our software has because in the grand scheme of things we are a fairly small customer, running a soon to be obselete operating system (windows mobile will soon be replaced with the radically different windows phone 7 http://videos.cnet.co.uk/39045189.htm) and they will sell very few copies of any improved ROCs. So they offer us something that is a bit crap, knowing that no one else has anything much better on the market.
    Maybe what we really need is someone to write reliable push-to-talk software for the iphone (or android thing whatever) as well as simple, basic despatch software that can handle billing and all the rest. Sell the office software for a lot of money to every courier company in the UK, and have a £10 app that every courier, mini-cab driver, etc. will purchase and run on their iphone.
    Sadly this will probably never happen, as anyone with the ability to write such software would probably focus on a larger/more lucrative market.. and I doubt it will come from the courier company side of things, since anyone with the knowledge and drive to create such software probably wouldn't have become a courier in the first place.
    •  
      CommentAuthoroverdrive
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     
    For a good few years now we have been using our phones instead of radios at Metro.It's been so much easier,I remember the radio system we had was rubbish,we shared the airwaves with another company so at times would have to wait for them to finish!If we get an unscheduled P/U we give a missed call then we get called back which means we don't pay for the call.This may seem time consuming but it works fine especially with a small fleet.

    I don't miss the radio's at all.I used to hate having to listen to all the crap coming out of that thing.There's a sense of freedom when you're not being hassled all day by some cretinous knobhead panicking over nothing and controllers are more civilised on the blower.Get rid of the radios and you get rid of smartarse comments from your controller too.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJanky
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     
    I just had a look into the YouPOC service. They are run through Vodafone, can do voice/PTT packages, and it sounds like they have some sort of control/despatch software that can send through data. The only weak link would be the inability to take signatures. Maybe the way forward is to go back to paper for the signatures and use the Sonim XP3 for communications and details via text.
    •  
      CommentAuthoroverdrive
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010 edited
     
    What was wrong with using a pen and paper in the first place?Apart from the difficulties faced by the illiterate of which there's at least one on this forum(Basie).
    •  
      CommentAuthorJanky
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     
    A place down in SW19 has second hand Sonim XP1s for £70 each. Why not buy some of these puppies at metro and kick start courier technology in London? Better yet call up YouPOC and use your clout within the Metro Buisness empire to get them to give you some demo phones for a couple weeks. Say that Metro might use them in its other operations and this could be their big chance to break into the graphics/fashion world. And insist they give me a free phone for coming up with the plan.
    • CommentAuthordubmess
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     
    Ola...
    when starting Velocity we were looking at other options for communication, as we have all at one stage had a Nokia with PTT options that haven't been accessible.

    In Sweden the couriers use this system and it works great, when I worked in NYC we had Nextels, similar and equally great.

    Anyhoo... one of the lads in Sweden put me in touch with these guys:
    http://pushtalk.se/
    Seems they can get PTT working anywhere and it's a small yearly fee around 80eurons. Here is the mail that the guy who runs it sent me:

    "Hi Graham,

    The challenge to get push-to-talk working in your case is to assure the network.
    We are an independent service provider which means that we will not supply you with the network access. In Scandinavia we work together with some operators to assure best network quality, but in foreign countries you have to test this yourself and we cannot make any guarantees.

    We can give you a few test accounts and send you instructions to set up service in a Nokia handset with a push-to-talk client but we will not be able to troubleshoot or assist you for network problems. Push-to-talk handsets from Nokia is listed on their web site

    You need SIM cards from a GSM/mobile operator with a preferable good data-plan and no restrictions in terms of access. Nated ip adresses or ports will not work and neither timeouts taking down data connections by operator. Andreas in Ronin will possible be able to give you some advice and assistance here since this is sometimes very time-consuming to troubleshoot the operators network if there is problems.

    When you have the push-to-talk devices and the SIM cards from the operator you just let me know the handset model an the mobile number and I will set you up for test."

    We never went with it as it seemed any tech problems would leave us completely stumped, but I'm guessing as Janky says you plucky Brits probably have a similar company there :whorship:
    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     
    And what was wrong with analogue??
    This digital shite is an utter waste of time... especially when the time is your money.
    • CommentAuthordubmess
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2010
     
    I don't get the obsession courier companies seem to have with digital signatures these days. They are virtually always unrecognisable scrawls. We don't use them, but anyone I know who does either has to take the persons name as well as the digital sig, or ask their name and write it themselves, which kinda defeats the purpose.

    I love paper, You write on it, file it, and it's always there. I ask for a printed name on our dockets, some of our clients want names as soon as the job is dropped so I shoot them an email from my phone. Simples.
    •  
      CommentAuthorpornomike
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2010
     
    "Metro Buisness empire"? When where you last in London?
    •  
      CommentAuthorBuffalo Bill
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2010 edited
     
    "I don't get the obsession courier companies seem to have with digital signatures these days. They are virtually always unrecognisable scrawls. We don't use them, but anyone I know who does either has to take the persons name as well as the digital sig, or ask their name and write it themselves, which kinda defeats the purpose.

    I love paper, You write on it, file it, and it's always there. I ask for a printed name on our dockets, some of our clients want names as soon as the job is dropped so I shoot them an email from my phone. Simples."

    The obsession isn't the courier companies', it's the clients.

    Digital signature capture technology is costly & inefficient, with very little to recommend it to the company - the only plus is that it saves some time when clients want a POD.

    But clients want it, and many clients now get their PODs automatically emailed to them *as they become available in real time*. So no way back, I am afraid, for most medium (10 - 100 mobiles) and large (100+) companies. Smaller outfits can probably still get away with paper tho.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJanky
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2010
     
    Graham,
    Thanks for the heads up, the UK equivalent is about £400 a year.. so if these guys can get it working it would be completely worth it. What did you guys end up using in the end?

    Bill-
    Do you think our clients would accept a "real-time" email with the name and time of the POD but the signature on paper? I would think that most clients would loose faith in digital pretty quick if they actually saw the digital signatures. YouPOC has a despatch program of some sort (I didn't get the details) and we could use the Sonims to send couriers job details and return the time and Name for the POD. The Sonim XP3 Quest also has GPS functions and all the rest. We could tell clients that thisis the best of both worlds.. a return to iron clad legally binding signatures but they can still call the postroom and hassle the signee by name minutes after it has been dropped. Only one machine (Mobile, radio, and XDA all replaced) to carry, and you maybe keep a couple spares in the office.. if anyone breaks one the courier switches their sim over to the spare and is back up and running in minutes. Another selling point to the courier companies could be the fact that they wouldn't have to provide the units... makes us look more like contractors than employees. Each courier could purchase and maintain their own PTT phone, instead of paying £40-50 a month for their XDA and radio. Or every courier buys their own handset and the company supplies the SIMs set up for the company plan. The company could completely exit the XDA and radio repair/troubleshooting business. You think you could get those running the show to request a few trial units?
    •  
      CommentAuthorJanky
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2010
     
    Maybe say something along the lines of:
    "Over the past five years we here at Bill's Despatch Service have tried multiple XDA units and versions of software but have begun to loose faith in the legibility of digital signatures. In the real world package recipients often sign quickly and lightly.. which on the best of these machines ends up looking like hieroglyphics. In the interests of providing our customers with legally valid signatures we will be introducing a new system where we can offer you a real-time email with the full name and time of signature of the recipient, but we will take the signature on paper."
    cmon Bill..
    •  
      CommentAuthoroverdrive
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2010
     
    At Metro we Have a tumble dryer.
    •  
      CommentAuthorwill
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2010
     
    Bill; as you know from the point of view of the riders the problem with the radios and XDAs is that essentially they do not provide the service that the they pay to receive. Anyone working a 20 day month is paying around £60; twice what I would pay for e-mail, broadband and TV from Virgin. If the service I received from Virgin was as unreliable as the one I get from my radio and XDA I would expect a refund or I would change provider. As a courier we don't have the option to change and are never offered a refund. It is an example, common I think to all courier companies, of the exploitation of our dodgy status in a way which, charitably, could be called unscrupulous. We are expected to be professional in the way we work and conduct ourselves but when it comes to the service we pay for we are expected to accept the privilege of putting up with something that is frequently amateurish.
    • CommentAuthorpinarello
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2010
     
    Agreed wit Janky and Will on the XDA issue.
    Getting about 10 errors a day on the unit is not enjoyable.You going to deliver a parcel, want to get a signature and you have to log on back to system that takes at least 1 minute. It waste our time/money and makes us look like unprofessional muppets!
    Than you asking if someone is doing anythink about it, and the answer is: We are monitoring the situation.....
    6 months...CMON!
    I understant that some clients want to have that electronic signature that looks nothink like the real one.(how many times the receptionist told you that doesn't look like my signature at all, my 2 year old child can sign better?)
    Have it their way than, they are the clients. I just want that damn machine to work properly, if I have to pay for it!
    •  
      CommentAuthorcunt bosie
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2010
     
    agree with janky.
    another reason for exploitation. soon the machines will take over and then where will the human race be...not sitting on a beach drinking pinafuckingcolardas. nah, harvested for the mines and used as parts for the cyberdyne system machines.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJanky
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2010
     
    Maybe the way to sell YouPOC PTT to the courier companies is this:

    Never again will you have to listen to couriers whinge about who got what job! Imagine.. no one will ever storm into the office at half five and have a go about that direct job going next to his house that you gave to someone else. No more paranoid couriers beating down your door because they heard someone elses name five times on the channel whilst standing by. that has got to be worth something.

    Another perk:
    Your couriers won't constantlly hang about outside as they will be reachable anywhere with Vodafone mobile coverage. back to the old days of hanging out in coffee shops or bookstores. Drier, warmer, less surly couriers, and less complaints from the neighbors.
  1.  
    @janky
    "Do you think our clients would accept a "real-time" email with the name and time of the POD but the signature on paper? I would think that most clients would loose faith in digital pretty quick if they actually saw the digital signatures."

    They do see the digital sigs.
  2.  
    @will "Bill; as you know from the point of view of the riders the problem with the radios and XDAs is that essentially they do not provide the service that the they pay to receive. Anyone working a 20 day month is paying around £60; twice what I would pay for e-mail, broadband and TV from Virgin. If the service I received from Virgin was as unreliable as the one I get from my radio and XDA I would expect a refund or I would change provider. As a courier we don't have the option to change and are never offered a refund. It is an example, common I think to all courier companies, of the exploitation of our dodgy status in a way which, charitably, could be called unscrupulous. We are expected to be professional in the way we work and conduct ourselves but when it comes to the service we pay for we are expected to accept the privilege of putting up with something that is frequently amateurish."

    I am not going to disagee with anything you say above, except to say that it is not true that Creative never offers or pays a refund. We frequently refund XDA & radio charges.
  3.  
    FWIW, I just got an email from Lisa today saying that in view of the problems with the radios (which Creative believes to have been sorted out), the riders will not be charged at all for the radios for a month from March 1st.
  4.  
    I say everyone should go back to homing pigeons.
    • CommentAuthorFesterban
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2010
     
    I hated using paper and find XDAs a hell of a lot easier to work with, but then again ours very rarely crash, jobs come through instantly and the signature screen works.
    • CommentAuthorsol
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2010
     

    in Paris some companies use phones now to communicate regularly with the controller – you call to check in, get “ok ‘ and the jobs pop up on your screen through internet connection. I’m not sure what software is used, but it really doesn’t seem too advanced.

    The big point is that the hones we use have cameras – so we just take the photos of a customer’s signature or stamp, attach it to the job file, tick it as delivered and it goes off the list .

    Yeah, there are annoying moments if you’re in a place with lov network coverage, but you just have to walk to the window then etc.

    • CommentAuthorRapattack
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2010
     
    oh the days of paper and radio. Playing chinese whispers with your controller. Walikng in to accounts like "hi im picking up from a company, its called Fannadank, Pannarank, Sanna Bank ? anything sound familiar?" lol
    •  
      CommentAuthor24tee
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2010
     
    Bet you pob'd in no time tho. Which is how you could tell a courier from a scrapper lol anybody can read the xda. If it happens to be working.
  5.  
    "oh the days of paper and radio. Playing chinese whispers with your controller. Walikng in to accounts like "hi im picking up from a company, its called Fannadank, Pannarank, Sanna Bank ? anything sound familiar?" lol"

    I was talking to one of our senior drivers about XDAs and radios, and all that. He recalled that when he first started at one of the bigger open-call channels, an essential piece of equipment was a dictaphone - the channel was that busy, you were expected to record the details, because the controller would not repeat them...

    I remember seeing all the 24 Hour Express & Addy Lee bikes with their dictaphones taped to their radios so they could just hit the record button on the fly.

    Open call... who still does that?
    • CommentAuthorRapattack
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2010
     
    hahahha yea ONE.ZEROOOOO.SEVEN Knightrider Pat used to have a dictaphone when we were back at Destinations. He would record every time the controller gave him a job. Then one day the controller accused him of getting some details wrong and fucking up a job. Little did he know that he had been recorded giving out the wrong details him self. I heard he was quite sheepish and apologetic when Pat arrived at the office and pressed play. Funny stuff
    • CommentAuthoreggpie
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2010 edited
     
    Im not in any way disputing that creative is one of the best for refunding radio/xda charges. And the free month is an awesome offer that nobody else in the industry is going to match.

    (Yes, that is a challenge to the others. Go into Sprint/Mach1/whoever on monday and tell them creative arent charging their riders, and see if theyll compete with that one, and Ill take whatever you get back to Creative and ask them to beat it. I'd love to see some competition working in the riders favour for once.)

    However. The XDA service is shit. And expensive shit at that. I can get a properly working iPhone/android with all the calls/data I'd need for a month for way less than Im paying for this paperweight. And I wouldnt have to pay extra charges to call the office every time my XDA crashes and the radio just doesnt work because Im in soho. The only reason I still carry 3 devices every day is that two of them are unreliable, and if I rented either of those devices from a company open to regulation and/or competition that company wouldnt be in business for very long.



    One month refund for the radios is a great offer, and the riders do appreciate it. But theyve been less than functional for a lot longer, and we had to pay for them anyway. And thats nothing compared to the XDA service, which has been terrible for years, and while a few days refunds have tempered the worst of that, its nothing compared to how much Ive been charged for a service that continues to fail to be able to make it through a whole morning without crashing.



    Will's absolutely right that its about professionalism. And walking into a client and asking them to wait while my XDA reboots because it crashed in the middle of getting a POD, or standing in front of them with no idea what Im collecting (because all my controller said was "details on screen"), doesnt make us look professional at all.



    You really send them the digital PODs? Even when someone writes "I hate couriers" or draws offensive pictures? I challenge you to tell most of my PODs apart from each other because theyre all scribbled because ROCS on those XDAs isnt fast enough to trace the screen accurately. I cant wait for the day someone challenges their legal validity. "Your customer didnt get that package? Ill check the docket. It says "Harley St(no full address)" and was signed by "D. Jones" with a scribble at 10.34. And my rider says it was three weeks ago and he doesnt remember anything". Did someone mention professionalism?



    ROCS removed the ability for riders to look at the POD on their own device when they "upgraded", so if a client signs and hits "OK" theres no way I can tell what they did. And if (as often happens) ROCS fails to send that POD, I have no copy or name to check, and suddenly the controller is relying on me telling them who signed (if I know them. If not, we're screwed). Sure, I can hit "resend", but you know how reliable that isnt. Do you tell those clients that their POD is "My rider said he gave it to Tony"?

  6.  
    Yes, we really send them the digital PODs. That is the only reason we (and every other courier company) uses them. So we can send our clients PODs digitally.

    Believe me, if we had a choice (which we don't, many purchasers won't even consider companies that don't offer digital capture & transmission of PODs - sounds great when you write it down, doesn't it?), we would not be using ROCS or any other software. I know that Lisa would get rid of them in an instant if she could.

    Like I said above, I don't necessarily disagree with anything you say. Apart from expecting professionalism from a courier company. I do try to be as professional as possible, but given the state of the market (which is another way of saying, look at what our rivals get up to - and we have to match them on price) my hands are tied.

    And it's worth saying that I raised all of this with my superiors, and we are going to look at it yet again, and go back to ROCS yet again, and raise it with them yet again.

    There's not really much more that I can say here.
    •  
      CommentAuthorwill
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2010
     
    You know Bill you actually see me in real life; you don't have to rely on me checking here to let me know what the company we work for is doing. It's an odd way to find out; or did I miss the notice in the Creative office? Anyway, yes, it's good that we are not being charged for a month but let's be clear we should not be grateful for that, Creative isn't doing us a favour as such it is only doing what it should even though it could get away with not doing so. Couriers shouldn't be overjoyed just because for once they are treated fairly when it comes to money. Which sounds begrudging I know but it is true all the same.
    And also I should say that of course if we are talking about un-professionalism I am more aware than anyone that you only have to take a 30 second walk round the corner from Creative to find out what a truly amateurish courier company is like.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjontibs
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2010
     
    It looks like the modern push to talk services work over SIP (a protocol for establishing VoIP calls), over a mobile broadband connection. This has the advantage of making it independent of the mobile company - you don't need them to provide any special service. But it has the disadvantage that it can be no more reliable than your data connection. My Orange connection wouldn't be reliable enough to run your whole business on - it slows to a crawl about the time everyone goes home from work. You would have to find a more reliable provider, or perhaps they give priority to data from business customers or something?
    • CommentAuthoreggpie
    • CommentTimeMar 7th 2010 edited
     
    Janky said:
    "No more paranoid couriers beating down your door because they heard someone elses name five times on the channel whilst standing by."

    Ah, the pre-XDA days when you could tell who was getting fed :)
    •  
      CommentAuthoroverdrive
    • CommentTimeMar 8th 2010
     
    Plonk Buffalo Bill on top of Creative Towers then get the old bugger to shout the work out over the rooftops.That way the whole of the west end will have to suffer the man's nonsensical controlling style and not just the riders.
    Just suggestin'.
    •  
      CommentAuthorwill
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    "Janky said:
    "No more paranoid couriers beating down your door because they heard someone elses name five times on the channel whilst standing by."

    Ah, the pre-XDA days when you could tell who was getting fed :) "

    oh yeh, as if hearing another rider be told "details coming through" isn't going to make paranoid riders even worse; details? what details? why's he getting a job and why is it being kept secret? I'll bet it's a direct, he's always being fed etc etc
    • CommentAuthoreggpie
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2010
     
    I think its his way of making work more interesting. Its still a shit docket, but now theres the element of surprise and mystery. Maybe the details will come through.

    Or maybe Ill have to stand in the street and wait for 10 fucking minutes to find out where Im going, because they didnt come through and the controller was on the phone taking a booking, but that client whos waiting for their urgent pickup will totally understand, and will definitely use such a professional company again, and meanwhile Ill definitely be reimbursed for the chunk of my life that I wont get back.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSideshow
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2010
     
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1312a_puma-messenger_shortfilms

    The bit where he's chatting to the guy in the bike shop... is that the push-to-talk system you're reffering to?
  7.  
    FWIW i think we will all end up keeping PMR for as long as it's affordable. Data is great, quick, clear, and works 99.something % of the time, but the radio is about a different sort of communication - a good controller is a man manager (and a woman manager, obv, though statistically less likely), and you can't gee up, cheer up, or hold up people without communicating with them.

    The problem with most XDA's is the platform - Microsoft just weren't that interested in mobile devices until a couple of other companies came along and obviously did - i haven't played with a Windows mobile 7 device yet, but i suspect no matter how stable it will be, it won't be suitable for us, because it isn't designed for us - what proportion of the mobile market are interested in signature capture?


    There isn't a good device available now - we have the last few 3470's, and beyond that we are going to have to look at bricks (clunky chunky motorla devices) or think of something clever - i'll be interested to hear suggestions.
    •  
      CommentAuthor1+1/8
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2010
     
    so many good comments, well, my 2 cents:

    signature may be legal or not, but somewhat irrelevant, theres only a problem if it got lost, and a pod can only point to who lost it, ITS STILL LOST! if it really needs a signature (im aware that some jobs do need this) then it should be wait and return otherwise you can assume the signature is not that important,

    my big issue is the "details coming thru" shambles, and i am at a loss to why details cannot be voiced over the radio, they used to, what changed? are controllers multitasking now? did the office software get fucked up when they changed to xda? anyone able to shed some light on this?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSideshow
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2010
     
    When the channel's really kicking, I prefer just quick 'details coming's because it keeps things snappy and fast. Everyone's getting their info and everyone's able to call in. If you have your XDA close to hand, you should be more than adept in pulling it out and reading it while on the go.
    •  
      CommentAuthor1+1/8
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2010
     
    for reals? like, ur park lane with a stephen st drop, and all u get is "details W1" ?????? give me the details and i will make the call on how to work it,
    "you do the dispatching, i'll do the riding"
    •  
      CommentAuthor1+1/8
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2010
     
    steven st? i forget
    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeNov 27th 2010 edited
     
    Its never been about the signature (execpt in extreme circumstances). All it needs is a name. When your xda/mobile device crashes and PODs are taken manualy, times are also added manualy (at any company ive worked for). The digital signature is not legaly binding, and time of delivery is changable. Quote me if im wrong but didnt the whole xda system (for london pushbike couriers) come into play due to to the appearance of e-courier and their (supposedely) computer based job allocation system? Thanks to this clients have come to expect "real time" tracking of thier parcels, which in reality on most pushbike circuits does not happen (even if the technology is there).

    At certain companies, all details are given out on the radio, prior to the docket landing on your xda. No actual need for the xda except to maintain this "digitaly enabled" facade, and to take some load from the controllers and office staff as they dont need to take your POD's.

    Result is: A constant increase in charges for the courier as the company upgrades to the latest technology. All cost is passed to the "subcontractor", and any downtime of said devices is also passed on to the courier ("come back to base and get it sorted").No benefit in my view to any xda system, its all a selling point ("Track your package Online!") which does not benefit the courier in any way, only the sales team.

    I made more money on paper dockets than under the xda system, it resulted in legaly binding signatures (so what!), less charges to the courier (all current charges are run at a profit), and more freedom (while still adhering to deadlines).


    Death to the XDA full stop. Its an unnecessary cost passed on to us, solely for the profitability/digital conformity of our respective companies.
    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeNov 27th 2010
     
    Long live the radio!!
    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeNov 27th 2010
     
    "Analog!"
    • CommentAuthorJP
    • CommentTimeNov 27th 2010
     
    Oh, and btw, Having the latest GPS enabled, trackable device is certainly not going to earn you more money. If clients book a direct/express/special/double rush/priority bike, they will expect to see it making its way (on their screen) to its destination with no stops/pick ups/ drops on the way... Controllers wont be able to give you any more...
    "Carry on, carry on..."
  8.  

    Clients now expect to have digital capture of PODS, emailed as soon as it is obtained. I don’t whether this is down to eCourier.

  9.  
    Bill is, unsurprisingly given his experience and the number of different angles he's seen this industry from, right.

    I'm no apologist for the XDA(MDA, mobile device, whatever), but the fact is that the genie is out of the bottle. I've seen it happen with a number of "enhancements" to what is essentially a pretty simple service. Mobile signature capture, and to only a slightly lesser extent, GPS capture is a big deal for the client - you have to ask why they are paying us the money in the first place - why do they want a thing that is in point A to actually be in point B? Because ultimately it is worth money to them. After all, whether anyone here likes it or not, the courier industry is an industry, and therefore plays by the rules of the socio economic system that calls for it and supports it. I won't lecture you on Marx, there's others here better qualified and more enthusiastic than me.

    So, one company says "we can e-mail you a signature the instant a parcel is delivered", it appeals to their needs, or at least the needs they feel they are satisfying by paying the courier - immidiacy, security, peace of mind, and to a lesser extent image and economy. The other companys have to follow suit, or they lose out.

    Similarly, one company says "we can let you see that when you pay a premium rate for a premium service, you get your moneys worth", everyone is going to be expected to provide it - what starts as a USP becomes an entry level requirement in a very short period of time - think cameras on mobile phones, think safety belts in cars, think the light that goes on in the fridge when you open it - none of them are the core product, they have started as extras, and become standards.

    Now i'm a great one for embracing technology, but where's the downside? If you are neurotic enough to think that your courier company gives you an MDA so they can charge you enough money to profit from it, then i'm not interested in your world view. As it happens the company i work for supplements about 50% of the cost, and we have found that if you let people have something for free, they treat it as if it is worthless.

    You don't want the client to see that you are not going one up on a non stop? There is a clue in the name, that's what they are paying for, that's what you are being paid twice as much or more for.

    And of course it is easier for controllers - why is that a bad thing? You might get old and slow and have to be a controller yourself one day, and when you are trying to give out 800 sets of details in 8 hours on a radio with 30 couriers on the other end you'll be over the moon that you can say "head for Whitefriars, details coming through" rather than having to phonetically spell "Department of Molecular Endocrinology, off de Crespigny Park Road" over the air.

    You don't have to stop, write it down, it eliminates mistakes, it takes the pressure off - but it's an enhancement - i would never advocate losing the radio. I remember bumping into an SD rider in the mid 90's when they were first experimenting with data. He had something the size of a cash register around his neck, and he was misreable - no human contact, he was just a part of the machine, with no feedback, input, nothing.

    Finally, e-courier is a clever piece of marketing, and little else, in my opinion. They didn't invent mobile data in our industry, or tracking, though if you believe their wiki page they invented the courier industry, and for that matter the car, the spinning jenny, and fire. I shan't carry on, as i work for one of their competitors, so i'm biased - and one of the competitors that could reasonably claim to have been involved in introducing MDA's to the despatch industry.

    Apologies if i'm teaching anyone to suck eggs.
  10.  
    For an experienced courier, well capable of taking details on the fly, or using the phone to take the tricky jobs, I reckon the XDA is an unnecessary imposition. If they were able to handle 30 - 40 jobs on paper, why would they suddenly need to use a digital aid? For sure, it makes some parts of the controller's job easier, but the PDA adds an extra level of complexity - which makes the controller's job harder.

    When I was first on the road, we had a radio and a piece of paper. Now the guys have a phone, a radio, a PDA and some unlucky guys carry a GPS locator *as well*. All of these increased costs have been pushed onto the rider. And this at a time when demand has contracted, therefore leaving the buyers able to force the prices down.
  11.  
    I have to disagree, gently, Bill - though i'm aware of the fact that i am as capable as anyone of choosing arguments that suit my position, opinion or agenda, we all do that.

    In the shell of a nut though, Most couriers aren't experienced at some point, and even those that are surely find the MDA, when it's working, which is sort of where we came in on this, anything other than an imposition? I love technology, but the idea of carrying two mobiles fills me with dread, so i'm not completely oblivious to what you are saying, but why not take the benefits of new technology if there is not a down side?

    I have never met a controller who finds working data anything other than easier than working without, and actually i can hand on heart say that the majority of riders and drivers o have known over the years since data became a part of my world (maybe 500?) have preferred it.

    You know that "buyers" will keep on trying to screw the price down, the data has nothing to do with it, any more than livery will, ISO accreditation, but at least data is easier than not data. I'm horrifed by the idea that there are riders having to carry extra GPS kit alongside their MDA.

    To be fair Bill, when you first started despatching you were having to take POD's on wax tablets....
  12.